Praxis: an attempt at ruthless criticism

The first public appearance of the entire editorial board of Praxis (Student Centre, Zagreb, end of 1964). From left to right: Rudi Supek, behind him (obscured from view), Branko Bošnjak, Gajo Petrović (editor-in-chief), Danilo Pejović (editor-in-chief), Predrag Vranicki, Milan Kangrga, Danko Grlić; far right (with back turned): the director of the Student Centre, M. Heremić, next to him, Antun Žvan.

Juraj Katalenac

Yugoslav socialism was a unique political experiment, not just because it said ‘no’ to Stalin in 1948 and implemented a system of workers’ self-management, but because of the uniqueness of the ‘left opposition’ and the critique of the political elite that emerged there. Unlike countries behind the ‘Iron Curtain’ Yugoslavia had a higher level of tolerance for political criticism – especially when it came from intellectual circles or opposition within the League of Communists.[1] When Aleksandar Ranković, head of state security service and prominent unitarist retired the space for free expression expanded, allowing cultural movements such as Yugoslav Black Wave cinema[2], and the new wave and underground music scenes to flourish[3]. There were obviously limits to this tolerance though. The League did not tolerate movements and initiatives that emerged in response to the realities of work life, such as workplace and other class-based struggles.

The emergence of the philosophical journal Praxis (1964-1974) and the Korčula Summer School (1963-1974) was an important political development as it was effectively the ‘left opposition’ within Yugoslavia. It was seen by some in ‘the west’ as exotic because few of its essays were translated and published in English. For this reason, a lot of ‘mist’ surrounds it. For example, Wikipedia and Marxist Internet Archive contain a lot of misinformation. The Memory of the World archive[4] tried to rectify this by uploading most issues of Praxis and other miscellaneous material. However, the language barrier remains as their ‘international editions’ did not include the vast bulk of the content produced and published by them.

In this essay I will present their story and explain why they were and remain an important development in history of Yugoslavia and their successor states.

Continue reading

Praxis: pokušaj nepoštedne kritike

Prvo javno pojavljivanje celokupnog uredničkog odbora Praxisa (Studentski centar, Zagreb, krajem 1964). S leva na desno, Rudi Supek, iza njega (zaklonjen) Branko Bošnjak, Gajo Petrović (glavni urednik), Danilo Pejović (glavni urednik), Predrag Vranicki, Milan Kangrga, Danko Grlić; s kraja desno (okrenut leđima): direktor Studentskog centra, M. Heremić, pored njega Antun Žvan.

Juraj Katalenac

Jugoslovenski socijalizam je bio jedinstveni politički eksperiment, ne samo zato što je 1948. rekao Staljinu ’ne’ i uveo sistem radničkog samoupravljanja, već i zbog jedinstvenosti ’leve opozicije’ i kritike političke elite koja se tamo pojavila. Za razliku od zemalja iza ’gvozdene zavese’, Jugoslavija je imala viši prag tolerancije za političku kritiku – naročito kada je dolazila od intelektualnih krugova ili opozicije unutar Saveza komunista.[1] Kada se Aleksandar Ranković, načelnik državne bezbednosne službe i istaknuti unitarista povukao, prostor za slobodno izražavanje se proširio, dopuštajući kulturnim pokretima poput crnog talasa,[2] i novog vala i underground muzičke scene da procvetaju.[3] Međutim, jasno je da su postojale granice te tolerancije. Savez nije tolerisao pokrete i inicijative koje su nastale kao reakcija na realnost radnog života, poput borbi na radnom mestu i drugih klasno zasnovanih borbi.

Pojavljivanje filozofskog časopisa Praxis (1964–1974) i Korčulanske ljetne škole (1963–1974) predstavljalo je važan politički razvoj pošto su oni faktički predstavljali ’levu opoziciju’ unutar Jugoslavije. Neki ’na Zapadu’ su ga smatrali egzotičnim, jer je nekoliko eseja prevedeno i objavljeno na engleskom. Iz tog razloga, Praxis okružuje mnogo nejasnoća. Na primer, Wikipedia i Marxist Internet Archive sadrže mnogo pogrešnih informacija. Digitalni arhiv Memory of the World[4] je pokušao da to ispravi postavljanjem većine brojeva Praxisa i drugog raznovrsnog materijala na Internet. Uprkos tome, ostaje jezička barijera, jer njegova ’internacionalna izdanja’ nisu obuhvatila ogroman deo sadržaja koji je napisan i objavljen.

U ovom eseju ću izneti Praxisovu priču i objasniti zašto je bio i ostao važan događaj u istoriji Jugoslavije i njenih država-naslednica.

Continue reading